Its everything, and I am getting super clean point clouds from phantom 4 pro drone photos. Its easy, but odd that the documentation does not recommend it as part of the standard workflow. It has a process where you refine the points used to stitch. Also, look up the “USGS workflow” for photoscan. You do need a medium machine with meduim graphics card that has CUDA, but most cad machines do. I went with photoscan and its been the best thing ever. I tried the big three – pix4d, drone deploy, and agisoft photoscan, but never bothered with autodesk’s solution but I would guess it uses pix4d behind the scenes. Must be some serious internal struggle going on as this is so counter to everything they claim to want. I know its hard to make vanilla Autocad all encompassing but the FBXexport can’t have been a big subroutine. My work around is to save as, then open the file in and export. This is a huge negative for and just caught me off guard. I move 3D objects seemlessly through FBX almost daily as part of my workflow. For me the “One AutoCAD” is a marketing name, but not a product specific name as my understanding is you have to install each vertical separately as before, but now it’s called toolset and not any more “AutoCAD Mechanical” or so. For me it’s not an upgrade, it’s a downgrade when a new version of a product can do less than the previous one. mcd.But there are some other reasons too to need FBX import and export. Review assets while on-the-go without having to rely on a 3D content creation tool.Review animated 3D assets using familiar play, pause, and scrub-through controls.Toggle between wireframe, shading, texture, and lighting options.Quickly open and review 3D models with the same visual fidelity of Viewport 2.0.FBX Review enables users to view 3D content without using a 3D authoring tool, to help speed up asset sharing and iteration. Autodesk® FBX® Review is a lightweight, standalone software tool for reviewing 3D assets and animations quickly and efficiently.
0 kommentar(er)
